Sunday, November 11, 2012

Health Care Reform Articles - November 11, 2012


Now the Work of Movements Begins

The election is over, and President Barack Obama will continue as the 44th president of the United States. There will be much attention paid by the pundit class to the mechanics of the campaigns, to the techniques of microtargeting potential voters, the effectiveness of get-out-the-vote efforts. The media analysts will fill the hours on the cable news networks, proffering post-election chestnuts about the accuracy of polls, or about either candidate’s success with one demographic or another. Missed by the mainstream media, but churning at the heart of our democracy, are social movements, movements without which President Obama would not have been re-elected.

U.S. Extends a Deadline for States on Coverage

WASHINGTON — With many states lagging far behind schedule, the Obama administration said Friday that it would extend the deadline for them to submit plans for health insurance exchanges, the online markets where millions of Americans are expected to obtain private coverage subsidized by the federal government.
The original Nov. 16 deadline will be extended to Dec. 14 — and in some cases to Feb. 15, the administration said.
The Congressional Budget Office predicts that 25 million people will obtain coverage through the new online shopping malls known as insurance exchanges. Most of them will receive federal subsidies averaging more than $5,000 a year per person to help them pay premiums.
Every state is supposed to have an exchange by Jan. 1, 2014, when the federal government will require most Americans to have insurance. Many states delayed work on the exchanges to see the outcome of a Supreme Court case challenging the health care law, then waited to see if President Obama would be re-elected.
If a state wants to run its own exchange, its governor still must submit a declaration of intent — generally a brief letter of one or two pages — by Nov. 16. But states will have more time to submit the detailed applications required by federal officials.
The White House has repeatedly said that states were making excellent progress toward creation of the exchanges, even as Republican governors and state legislators expressed ambivalence or outright opposition. In addition, state officials who want to establish exchanges said they were having difficulty because Mr. Obama had yet to issue crucial regulations and guidance.
In a letter to governors on Friday, Kathleen Sebelius, the secretary of health and human services, said that many states had asked for “additional time” to submit applications indicating whether they wanted to run their own exchanges or help the federal government run exchanges in their states.

The Great Experiment

Anyone who still has a smidge of humanity left after our $6 billion electoral argument should consider the symbolism at the top of a ballot now headed for history's vault. The incumbent's father is from a race of people first brought to these shores in chains and sold like whiskey barrels at portside auctions. The challenger's father was born in Mexico, to a family of sexual and religious outlaws who fled the United States.
At the first-ever Republican convention, in 1856, the party platform called for ending the two great sins of American life - "these twin relics of barbarism, polygamy and slavery."
Slavery and polygamy are indeed relics, for the American story is one of working past the barbarism, past the irrational hatred - an arc of enlightenment, with dips along the way.
All of which makes Tuesday's election worth looking at from a longer, wider view. The audacity of electing a black man or a Mormon bishop to lead the free world is something, still. But the overarching Great Experiment - the attempt to create a big, educated, multi-racial, multi-faith democracy that is not divided by oligarchical gaps between rich and poor - is still hanging in the balance.

Animus based on skin color has hardly disappeared: a majority of Americans, 56 percent, harbor some anti-black sentiment, up from 49 percent four years ago, according to a recent Associated Press survey.
You need only read the comments section on a typical day on Glenn Beck's Web site, The Blaze, to find that pond scum has found a crowd. There, Michelle Obama is oft-compared to a cow, her husband is routinely labeled a Muslim Kenyan, and the following type of anonymous post about blacks, from July 12, goes by without challenge: "I think they should go to Africa and live among 'their people' and see how far they get. They as a whole do not appear to see past color and 'gimmee somethin' mista.' There is something missing with these people."

Republican governors scramble over next Obamacare steps

Friday, November 9, 2012

Health Care Reform Articles - November 9, 2012


With Obama Re-Elected, States Scramble Over Health Law



After nearly three years of legal and political threats that kept President Obama’s health care law in a constant state of uncertainty, his re-election on Tuesday all but guarantees that the historic legislation will survive.
Now comes another big hurdle: making it work.
The election came just 10 days before a critical deadline for states in carrying out the law, and many that were waiting for the outcome must now hustle to comply. Such efforts will coincide with epic negotiations between Mr. Obama and Congress over federal spending and taxes, where the administration will inevitably face pressure to scale back some of the costliest provisions of the law.
Mr. Obama faces crucial choices about strategy that could determine the success of the health care overhaul: Will the administration, for example, try to address the concerns of insurers, employers and some consumer groups who worry that the law’s requirements could increase premiums? Or will it insist on the stringent standards favored by liberal policy advocates inside and outside the government?
But for now — with Democrats retaining control of the Senate and Mitt Romney’s vow to “repeal and replace” the law no longer a threat — supporters are exulting.
“For our district and for our country, the debate on Obamacare is over,” declared Bill Foster, a Democrat elected Tuesday to the House from a suburban Chicago district.
Many supporters feel one of Mr. Obama’s most important tasks will be to step up efforts to promote and explain the law to a public that remains sharply divided and confused about it. In exit polls on Tuesday, nearly half of voters said the law should be either partly or fully repealed.
“There is still a tremendous amount of disinformation out there,” said Jeff Goldsmith, a health industry analyst based in Virginia. “If you actually are going to implement this law, people need to know what’s in it — not just the puppies-and-ice-cream parts, but ‘Here are the broader social changes intended and how they can help you.’ ”

Sanofi Halves Price of Cancer Drug Zaltrap After Sloan-Kettering Rejection



In an unusual move, a big drug company said on Thursday that it would effectively cut in half the price of a new cancer drug after a leading cancer center said it would not use the drug because it was too expensive.
The move — announced by Sanofi for the colon cancer drug Zaltrap — could be a sign of resistance to the unfettered increase in the prices of cancer drugs, some of which cost more than $100,000 a year and increase survival by a few months at best.
Zaltrap came to market in August at a price of about $11,000 a month. Soon after, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York decided not to use the drug, saying it was twice as expensive but no more effective than a similar medicine, Avastin from Genentech. Both drugs improved median survival by 1.4 months, doctors there said.
Three doctors at Sloan-Kettering publicized the cancer center’s decision last month in an Op-Ed article in The New York Times.
“Ignoring the cost of care is no longer tenable,” they wrote. ”Soaring spending has presented the medical community with a new obligation. When choosing treatments for patients, we have to consider the financial strains they may cause alongside the benefits they may deliver.”
Sanofi executives argued that the price they had set was very similar to that of Avastin. “The intent was not to charge a premium,” Christopher A. Viehbacher, the chief executive of Sanofi, said in an interview last month.
Sloan-Kettering, he said, was basing its price comparison on a dose of Avastin that was half the dose Sanofi used in its own comparison.
On Thursday, Sanofi backed down. “We believe that Zaltrap is priced competitively as used in real-world situations,” it said in a statement. “However, we recognize that there was some market resistance to the perceived relative price of Zaltrap in the U.S. — especially in light of low awareness of Zaltrap in the U.S. market. As such, we are taking immediate action across the U.S. oncology community to reduce the net cost of Zaltrap.”

Attacking Ailments With Small Doses



DISAPPOINTED voters, runners with blisters and headache sufferers alike are getting some unexpected relief from a pop-up pharmacy that opened this week in the nation’s capital.
The “help shop,” which offers low-dose drugs for everyday woes, is the idea of Help Remedies, a start-up company that sells minimalist white packets directed at single medical issues like nausea, headache or insomnia.
The company, the collaboration of two marketers, is creating quirky scenes including a high-heel wearing model walking on a treadmill to market its “Help, I have a blister” packet of bandages, or a performer sleeping in a store window to drum up interest for its “Help, I can’t sleep” caplets.
This week, shoppers and passers-by attracted by the napper, for example, could go inside the temporary pharmacy to investigate its 10 over-the-counter remedies for conditions like body aches and allergies.
The store’s team fanned out to polling stations on Tuesday to hand out its headache packets, and then on Wednesday to the nearby Republican National Committee to share nausea relief. Their marketing may be seen as fun and zany, but the company founders, Richard Fine and Nathan Frank, say they have a serious message.
“We want people to see that there are simple solutions,” said Mr. Fine, who said his straightforward approach was influenced by his parents, who are medical professors specializing in epidemiology.
“Most people shop by brand or product, and it’s difficult to know what you should be buying and taking,” he said. “It is a confusing space for people who are not experts.”
Mr. Fine and Mr. Frank, who met while working in branding and advertising, decided to try to streamline what they see as an antiquated and cluttered pharmaceutical market.
“We wanted to take what’s basic and works, and make it human,” Mr. Fine said. Their strategy of providing single ingredients in low dosages is aimed at basic medical conditions that do not require hospitalization.

Maine may warm to Obamacare after Democratic sweep

Posted Nov. 08, 2012, at 2:24 p.m.
North of the Mason-Dixon Line, it’s hard to find a state that has given more of a cold shoulder to President Barack Obama’s health law than Maine.
It was one of 27 states that joined the suit to overturn the law, which was eventually upheld by the Supreme Court.
This year the state not only showed no interest in expanding Medicaid as the law requires, it took steps to shrink the rolls of the state-federal health insurance program for the poor, leaving thousands without coverage. In September, the state sued the federal government to reduce the program further, arguing a provision in the law barring states from making it harder for people to qualify was invalid.
But Maine’s voters may have short-circuited further resistance Tuesday by initiating a Democratic sweep that flipped control of both houses of the State Legislature, and is now poised to challenge Gov. Paul LePage, a tea party Republican opposed to the law.
“A new direction is likely to prevail,” Terry Hayes, Assistant Democratic Leader in the Maine House, said in an interview. “We will look to fully implement the Affordable Care Act.”
LePage congratulated the victorious lawmakers, but his spokeswoman had no comment on how the political switch might affect implementation of the health law.
“It certainly changes the dynamics,” said Maine Sen. Roger Katz, a Republican member of the appropriations committee. But he noted that LePage could veto Democratic efforts to restore Medicaid cuts, or to expand the program. “Hopefully we can work together,”said the Augusta lawmaker.
Maine is one of five states — Minnesota, Colorado, New York and Oregon — in which Democrats won control of the legislature Tuesday. But the shifts in Maine and Minnesota – where a Democratic governor supportive of the law had previously battled with Republicans — are likely to have the greatest impact on the health law’s implementation.


Thursday, November 8, 2012

Health Care Reform Articles - November 8, 2012


Facing brain surgery, a health economist finds the health-care market hard to navigate

By Dahlia K. Remler, Published: November 5

“You should never have an HMO,” the neurosurgeon’s secretary told me on the phone, her voice filled with scorn. “You don’t have any out-of-network benefits. Dr. Bruce participates with no insurance plans. Only out-of-network benefits can be used.”
I felt sick — not because of the recently discovered benign tumor in my pituitary gland or the resulting excess cortisol in my body or the delicate neurosurgery required. Rather, I felt sick with embarrassment and a sense of professional failure.
I am a health economist, a professor with a PhD from Harvard. I’m supposed to be an expert on health insurance and its complexities. How did I end up in such a bind?
I tried to recover my dignity and act like an expert: “How much does it cost if you pay out of pocket? $20,000?”
“For the surgeon. . . . But you have to pay for the hospital, too, even if the hospital is in-network. When you use an out-of-network surgeon, the whole thing counts as out-of-network,” she said.
How could I have forgotten that? I hung up with the depressing impression that having Bruce as my surgeon would cost me around $60,000 out of pocket.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/facing-brain-surgery-a-health-economist-finds-the-health-care-market-hard-to-navigate/2012/11/05/0a931b5c-fcf1-11e1-b153-218509a954e1_print.html


Anthem clerical error adds anxiety to woman's breast cancer fight

After Ann Walton-Teter has a double mastectomy, she learns her coverage has been canceled. Anthem Blue Cross admits mistake but timing couldn't have been worse.

David Lazarus
November 6, 2012


Ann Walton-Teter was diagnosed with breast cancer in September. About a month later, she was informed by her health insurer, Anthem Blue Cross, that her coverage had been canceled because of a missed payment.
Anthem would eventually admit that it was mistaken. But Walton-Teter, 43, had to battle the insurance giant to have her coverage restored just as she was recovering from a double mastectomy and preparing for chemotherapy.
In other words, the Santa Monica resident had to go up against a corporate bureaucracy while she was at her weakest and most vulnerable — a situation that plays out time after time nationwide as insurers challenge patients' claims or doctors' prescriptions in the midst of medical crises.
To all those who believe the U.S. healthcare system is second to none, Walton-Teter's case serves as a stark reminder that things can go horrendously wrong even if the patient does everything right.
"It's like they were bullying me to go away," Walton-Teter told me. "You buy insurance in case anything comes up. But when it does, this is how they treat you."


EMMC to build tower as part of ambitious $250M project

Posted Nov. 07, 2012, at 5:40 p.m.
BANGOR, Maine — Eastern Maine Medical Center will build a seven-story tower at its State Street campus as part of a $250 million project described as the largest ever undertaken by the hospital’s parent organization.
The board of directors for Eastern Maine Healthcare Systems, of which EMMC is a member, gave final approval to the project Tuesday, more than five years after plans were first presented.
In addition to demolishing the hospital’s Stetson building to make way for the tower, plans call for adding more than a dozen operating suites, boosting the number of private patient rooms, updating cardiac and obstetrics services, and relocating the neonatal intensive care unit.
The project is imperative for EMMC, which serves more than 40 percent of the state’s population as the only provider of many specialty medical services, including trauma and advanced critical care, in the region, said Deborah Carey Johnson, the hospital’s president and CEO.
“Without this project, specialty care in northern and eastern Maine would really be at risk,” she said.
The tower project is one of the most ambitious tackled by a Maine hospital in recent years. It’s smaller than MaineGeneral’s pursuit of a $300-plus million hospital in Augusta, but dwarfs Maine Medical Center’s plan for a $40 million expansion and update of several operating rooms. Also in Portland, Mercy Hospital has been shifting its services to a new campus on the Fore River, a multi-year project pegged at $162 million.
The most recent significant construction project at EMMC’s State Street campus was a $16 million, five-story parking garage that opened in 2009.
EMMC has focused more on outpatient services in recent years, with the construction of its health care mall on Union Street and, in 2000, of the Kagan building at its main campus, Johnson said.
“Where we’ve fallen behind a bit is on our inpatient campus,” she said.
The outpatient additions were significant, but the tower project approved this week represents a milestone for EMHS, she said.
EMHS is one of the state’s largest healthcare systems, counting not only seven hospitals among its members but also numerous home health organizations and several physician groups and nursing homes.

Obamacare gets its vindication

By Published: November 7

George Shultz once offered advice to Cabinet secretaries seeking to make a difference, advice that applies equally well to presidents. It’s easy to be consumed by your in box in these big jobs, Shultz explained. The flow of “incoming” could keep anyone fully occupied from the moment they were sworn in to the day they left office. The key to leaving your mark is to be sure you work on priorities you select and put into other people’s in-boxes. Don’t just work off your own.
This sound counsel captures why Barack Obama’s devotion to major health reform was so important — and why the risks he took to pursue that course must make his vindication Tuesday night especially sweet.
Obama didn’t “have” to do health reform. It wasn’t in his in box. A historic economic collapse was. He could have devoted himself exclusively to economic crisis management. (Though even if he’d done that, it’s not clear the recovery would be further along. After all, the Republicans blocked the sensible infrastructure investments in his Jobs Act a year ago that would have left 1 million more Americans working today — and unemployment at 7.2 percent, not 7.9 percent).
But Obama took the longer view. He knew U.S. health care was a scandal, with outsize costs and 50 million people uninsured. Now, thanks to the president’s reelection and the certainty that the law will be phased in by 2014, everything will change.
For the first time, Americans will have guaranteed access to coverage at group rates outside the employment setting. This fact got zero discussion in the campaign, but it’s impossible to overstate its significance. We’re the only wealthy nation where such access isn’t the case today. It’s been bad for people and disastrous for entrepreneurship (because budding entrepreneurs routinely stay in jobs they dislike in order to keep health coverage if there’s illness in their family).
The status quo has been bad for business, which carries the cost of health care on its payrolls. It’s also been bad for workers, because the cash devoured by employer-paid health premiums would otherwise be available for higher wages.


Obama's win means his healthcare law will insure all Americans

By Noam N. Levey
3:02 AM PST, November 8, 201

WASHINGTON — President Obama’s victory all but assures that his landmark healthcare law and its guarantee of insurance coverage for all Americans will be implemented, essentially putting an end to the Republican campaign to derail the law.
Starting in 2014, millions of Americans should be able to get health insurance for the first time. Millions more who don’t get coverage through work should be able to buy a health plan that meets new basic standards.
“It’s all over but the shouting,” said Families USA Executive Director Ron Pollack, an influential consumer advocate and leading champion of the law. “What was very questionable at the start of the year has been settled. … The Affordable Care Act will be a permanent fixture of the American healthcare system.”

California speeds revamp of health insurance market

With Obama victory, state officials move ahead with implementing healthcare changes under the Affordable Care Act and expand insurance coverage.

By Chad Terhune, Los Angeles Times
5:51 PM PST, November 7, 2012
With President Obama's reelection lifting a potential roadblock, California officials are rushing to implement the federal healthcare law and revamp the insurance market for millions of Californians starting next fall.
Republican challenger Mitt Romney had vowed to overturn the Affordable Care Act, casting uncertainty over efforts in California to use billions of federal dollars to extend coverage to many of the state's 7 million uninsured.

Wednesday, California officials disclosed plans to spend nearly $90 million next year on marketing and outreach to millions of consumers who may become eligible for premium subsidies and other assistance under the federal law starting in 2014.
"The election removes what was really the last distraction from focusing on the job, which is to get millions of Californians enrolled in health coverage," said Peter Lee, executive director of the California Health Benefit Exchange, which was renamed Covered California last week.


Health Net posts plunge in profit, strikes deal with California

Investors cheer the deal, which ends the insurer's litigation over reimbursement, extends Medi-Cal contracts and promises extra payments if new programs lead to unexpectedly big losses.

By Chad Terhune, Los Angeles Times
November 6, 2012

Woodland Hills insurer Health Net Inc. said third-quarter net income plunged 71%, but its shares rose as the company resolved a dispute with California officials over reimbursement for government health programs.
Health Net disappointed investors in August when it slashed its full-year profit outlook and reported higher-than-expected medical costs. On Monday, Chief Executive Jay Gellert said the company was making progress on its turnaround plans. He cited a wide-ranging agreement with California healthcare officials as a major step forward.
Investors cheered the news, bidding up Health Net shares by $3.03, or 13%, to $25.71.
The deal with the California Department of Health Care Services ended company litigation over government reimbursement. As part of the agreement, Health Net said, the state will extend four existing Medi-Cal contracts by five years and provide additional payments if the company incurs larger-than-expected losses as new government programs get underway next year.

Obama's health care overhaul turns into a sprint

In the two years since passage of the Affordable Care Act, the Obama administration has been consumed with planning and playing political defense. Now it has to quickly turn to execution.

Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar / The Associated Press
WASHINGTON — Its place assured alongside Medicare and Medicaid, President Barack Obama's health care law is now in a sprint to the finish line, with just 11 months to go before millions of uninsured people can start signing up for coverage.

Presque Isle hospital turns to agriculture to raise money, awareness of facility

Posted Nov. 06, 2012, at 12:15 p.m.
PRESQUE ISLE, Maine — Looking to celebrate its heritage and raise money for needed medical equipment, a Presque Isle hospital successfully turned to Aroostook County agriculture for help reaching its goal.
The Aroostook Medical Center this past summer launched two separate campaigns to celebrate its 100th birthday and to raise money toward the purchase of a Giraffe Warmer that will be used for premature babies at the hospital.
The vision for what now is TAMC came from Frank White, an attorney, in 1908, according to hospital officials. During that time, White had made frequent trips to outlying farms and neighboring smaller communities by horse and wagon, soliciting donations.
Through the efforts of White and other community leaders, Presque Isle General Hospital was incorporated on April 8, 1912.
In June, the hospital unveiled the TAMC Centennial Potato Plot, a two-acre section of a field on U.S. Route 1 between Presque Isle and Caribou. Cavendish Produce donated the two acres of russet potatoes that were planted. The field was envisioned as a way to celebrate the hospital’s 100th birthday and its ties to agriculture.
Hospital employees and their family members harvested the field by hand in early October.
Aroostook County candidates running for the Maine State Legislature each were presented with a commemorative five-pound bag filled with russet potatoes.
Officials with TAMC and project partners Cavendish Produce and Northeast Packaging Company also gave two commemorative bags of potatoes to U.S. Sen. Susan Collins — one for her to enjoy, the other for her to deliver to the White House. U.S. Rep. Mike Michaud also received a bag for himself and another to present to U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack.
In late July, the hospital announced a plan to raise money for the Giraffe Warmer with some help from Houlton Farms Dairy.

Youth obesity to cost Maine $1.2 billion, UMaine study finds

Posted Nov. 05, 2012, at 3:30 p.m.
Obesity among children and teens in Maine could cost more than $1 billion over the next 20 years, according to a new University of Maine study.
Today, just under 8 percent of Maine’s children and adolescents are obese. But as those youths grow into adults, that proportion likely will rise to more than 25 percent, according to the study by Todd Gabe, an economics professor at UMaine.
Obese children are much more likely than their healthy-weight peers to grow into obese adults, the study found. The medical costs from obesity increase as people age.
“We’ve all heard about the nationwide obesity epidemic, and these figures bring the problem — especially the challenge facing our children as they become adults — closer to home,” Gabe said.
The medical costs of obesity — including inpatient and outpatient treatment and prescription drugs — for today’s school-age children in Maine will reach $1.2 billion by 2032, Gabe estimates.
That price tag reflects a snapshot of obesity among the current crop of school-age kids in Maine. It doesn’t take into account obesity among future classes of children entering their school-age years or adults.
The estimate also doesn’t include indirect costs, such as lost productivity at work when those children become adults, a factor some studies have shown to be an even bigger drag on the economy than the direct medical costs of obesity, Gabe said.
“If anything, these cost numbers are conservative,” he said.
Gabe’s study was funded in part through a partnership among the Maine Association for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance; the Maine Department of Education; and UMaine’s College of Education and Human Development.
He used statistics from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and data including about 2,000 school-age children in Maine compiled by physical education teachers in 18 schools across the state as part of ongoing research in the UMaine College of Education and Human Development.
Physical education teachers across the state measured the fitness of students ages 10-14.